Marriage crucified

Finally, women of
India have successfully crucified the sacred institution of marriage. First, the proliferation of misuse of IPC 498A (anti-dowry law), which has created much apprehension in the hearts of many families who are under constant threat of being falsely implicated under IPC 498A. When that was not enough to satisfy the modern sadist (women), they have now introduced Domestic Violence Bill in order to loot the husband and his family legally.  

More than 60,000 cases are filed each year, 800,000 families are badly affected and more than 90% of the cases are false. Shocking!!! The more shocking is to know that women organizations and the Government are aware of these figures but are not willing to protect the husband and his family from being victimized in the hands of their unscrupulous wife/daughter-in-law. Media, too, shamelessly is not willing to accept the blame for not raising this serious issue in the public. It is very clear that the women organizations have deliberately instigated such a plot to harass innocent families and the Government is helping them to ruin marriages.   

It is important to note that those innocent people who have been falsely implicated didn’t commit any crime, but they had to pay a very large sum of money to their sleazy wife to settle the case. This situation is even worse than dowry. To top it all, Domestic Violence Bill gives ridiculous rights to women to loot their husband and in-laws legally. Women call this as gender equality. Some women are bold enough to blurt it out that now its men’s turn to suffer in pain. This clearly shows that sadistic approach in attaining gender equality. Unfortunately, with people’s ignorance and lack of empowerment, they are simply living their helpless life under constant threat, thanks to bias media.  

Anybody with reasonable maturity can figure out from these developments that women are not interested in gender equality; they are aiming for a World where men live like pet dogs to them who are stinking rich. Men will be legally obligated to live like pet dogs to women, earn lots of money and give it away to his wife, satisfy her sexual needs as and when, and finally to cheerfully dance on her tunes like a monkey.  

However, in order to create the balance of power between the two genders, men are now beginning to realize that women can’t be judged from their beauty. Men are becoming conscientious to an extent that they find it highly unreasonable to follow the age-old tradition of respecting, protecting and providing for women. They are now beginning to accept women as just another person in the society who can potentially hurt them. Now men will not fall for a beautiful and curvaceous woman having greed, jealousy and hatred in her heart. And there are plentiful of such women out there. This positive change will definitely shake the foundation of radical feminism. Needless to say, media will remain shameless and continue to protect the deception of women empowerment. 

Women had dug up a grave for men but it seems women are going to fall into it and men are going to have loads of laugh.

Justice for Men

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/2181224.cmsA 45-year old Armogam Munnaswami Kounder walked out of Pune’s Yerawada Jail after spending 11 years in prison on charges of raping and murdering a six-year old girl.  

Although the punishment for such crimes is life imprisonment but he was a free man only after spending 11 years in jail. Why? 11 years isn’t enough for a crime like this, right? But what if he was innocent? What if he was falsely implicated and framed by the police? And that is exactly what happened with this hapless innocent man.  

Kounder was an illiterate sweeper with the Brihan Mumbai Municipal Corporation. On 1 June 1995, the police came and arrested him. The police showed him the body of the girl and took him to the lock up. Kounder, who was unfamiliar with Hindi or Marathi, made futile attempts to prove his innocence. He was brutally beaten up by the police in the lock-up. Kounder was then convicted. Human Rights Commission need to shut down their organization if they can’t ban third degree torture during interrogation.   

Fortunately, the cop who falsely implicated Kounder committed suicide and also left a suicide note in which he confessed that Kounder was framed by him at the instance of his superiors. The judges then decided to acquit Kounder.  

Now Kounder roams the streets of Pune and was at a complete loss. He went back to
Vellore to try to reunite with his wife and kids who never came to see him after he was falsely convicted. Talk about marriage vows taken by his wife to support her husband in all circumstances.  

He lost 11 years of his life and also his family only because of the insensitive attitude of the legal system toward male gender. It goes without saying that there are hundreds of prisoners who are falsely implicated and are waiting for someone to come and prove their innocence. But maybe that someone will never arrive because the whole legal system has been engaged in pampering female gender. In order to sensitize the legal system toward female gender, the judiciary aren’t worried about innocent people been falsely convicted in the process of appeasing women groups. For women groups, this is equality and fair play.  

Ask these women groups to rehabilitate Kounder and their answer would be, “That is not our concern.” Yes, their only concern is to take away basic rights of men and also deceive people by saying that it is all part of gender equality process.   

Extortion

Ramesh, a respectable businessmen and a caring family man, receives a phone call from an anonymous caller.  

Anonymous: “Ramesh, if you do not pay us Rs. 25 lakhs, we will kill you.”Ramesh agrees with the demands of the anonymous person and arranges to pay him Rs. 25 lakhs. But he also informs the police about the extortion call. The police plans to catch the culprit red-handed and the anonymous person does get caught and is punished with imprisonment and fine.  

The extortionists threatened to kill Ramesh if he does not agree to their demands. Under Indian Penal Code, this is a punishable crime.  

However, there are other methods to extort money from someone, which as incredible as it sounds, is not punishable crime.  

Who isn’t interested in getting a quick buck? Apparently, earning a quick buck is the prerogative of women in Indian society. 90% of the cases filed under dowry harassment case of IPC 498A are false confirms lawyers. 90%!!!! Apparently, the citizens of
India has no rights to demand an explanation as to why the IPC 498A hasn’t yet been amended to curb this misuse. After all, the opportunity to earn a quick buck by women misusing the laws isn’t openly disclosed, thanks to biased media.  

The wife, who succeeded camouflaging her greed for money and power, goes to the police to file a case of false dowry harassment against her husband and in-laws. After discussing with her lawyer, the lawyer contacts the husband and in-laws and demands Rs. 25 lakhs to be paid to the wife if they want to settle the case amicably. Amicably?  

The husband, being aware of how biased the legal system is, decides to pay the money to his wife and seeks to settle the case. He pays because he is given an opportunity to sneak out of the strangle-hold of the legal system which considers all women as victims and all men as criminals. Incredibly, this whole extortion takes place right under the nose of the cops and they too seek to benefit from such a transaction.  

The husband attains freedom by paying a huge sum of money under the supervision of the police, the legal system makes sure that the rights of women are protected, and the wife goes away with a hefty sum of money by threatening the husband of legal consequences. Now that is an impressive way of earning a quick buck, legally. The wife goes home with a grin and observes that whatever she did, legal system, society, media and the government is with her. 

Women call this method of extortion as their rights. Rights?  

Double standard of women

Ravan had ten heads but he had only one distinct personality. Whereas Indian women have one head but many conflicting personalities. Women have always been hard to understand. The reason was not that they are enigmatic and unpredictable. The reason had been that men were conditioned to think in a particular manner about women. Most of the time men find it difficult to learn from experiences where he sees a distinct difference between the woman and the belief system the society carries about women. But now men have rejected the old outdated belief system about women and have begun understanding women through observation and experience. They now know that what they are asked to see is not always true.   

Feminists have been babbling about women rights and people are now kind of getting bored and irritated with their eccentric ideologies on womanhood. People are realizing that these feminists are holding a double standard in their so-called woman liberation. They want to be financially independent and also want to brag about it on a global scale but when it comes to alimony, they don’t feel ashamed of demanding her ex-husband to pay them maintenance. Where is their so-called dignity the idea of women liberation at the time of being a financial burden on her ex-husband especially when they brag about being financially independent? It seems that they do not have any self-respect or dignity and that is why they are not ashamed of extracting money from their ex-husband even when they are financially independent. They wouldn’t want to miss any chance to pass the buck onto her ex-husband’s shoulder of providing her financially. This is double standard.  

They are not only shaking off their basic family responsibilities, but they are also offensively dictating the duties of men. When it comes to their freedom, they rationalize their self-centered actions by comparing the culture of US and when it comes to the men’s freedom, they remind people of the tradition of our country that men must support and provide woman. That means women have the right to follow US culture and men are obligated to follow
India’s 14^th century tradition. When a man gets into an extramarital affair, he is called a cheat and disloyal to his wife. But when a woman gets into an extramarital affair, she is called a modern woman who does not hesitate to satisfy her sexual needs. She is praised when she has a one-night-stand and when a man has a one-night-stand, his character is assassinated ruthlessly.  

Men are naturally attracted to women and they will try to grab the attention of women in more than one ways. But women never admit that they want to grab men’s attention by wearing skimpy clothes. They often rationalize saying that they wear skimpy clothes because they feel comfortable. Women want men to look at them and also want to induce sexual feelings in men toward them. But when men do look at them, they immediately conceal their ulterior motives by saying men only think about sex and that they dislike being ogled by men. What a big lie!  

They even make a big fuss that so-and-so city is not safe for women because they can’t go out in the middle of the night. Well, going out in the middle of the night is not safe for men either. And only a person with questionable maturity would want to go out in the middle of the night to see if they are safe. No country in the world is safe in the night for anybody including US.  

Feminists are encouraging women to get aggressive, offensively assertive and whimsical and this can easily be seen in today’s modern women. Men are constantly bombarded with the etiquettes he must follow of respecting all women equally and acting submissive to the woman’s desires. It is alright for women to humiliate, insult, and offend a man and she will also be praised to give a piece of her mind to that innocent man. But when a man even attempts to defend his dignity, he is brutally criticized for disrespecting a woman’s dignity and modesty. It seems that dignity, self-respect and modesty is the prerogative of only women and these feminists are trying hard to demean men’s status in the society even though their own father, husband, brother and son are also men. 

They even try to remind people that in
India, women are worshipped and therefore, the tradition must go on even now. In that case men too are worshipped because most of the Indian Gods are males. No! Men, according to feminists, must worship women and women must not worship men at all. As a matter of fact, women must demean men so that they learn the lesson for not listening to women. With such offensive, destructive attitude of women, the Indian society will soon be destroyed beyond repair and women shall be wholly responsible. Modern women just can’t follow one simple principle – Give Respect to Earn Respect. Being intensely demanding only proves their pathetic arrogance.

Bias against women

Indian women are relentlessly babbling about the bias a woman faces in
India. Let’s take a look at how true their claims are. 

1) Taxable Income: It is an accepted fact that the financial responsibility of the family invariably lands on the male members of the family. Women have started earning and are enjoying every bit of bragging the media is doing on their behalf. However, the financial responsibility is on the man’s shoulder, the woman gets a preferential treatment as far as taxation is concern. Women have higher disposable income after tax than men even though men are obligated to provide the family. Isn’t this bias? According to women, this is bias against women as women are demanding more and more tax concession. When asked why, their answer is because they are women. Just because they are women, they have the right to get better than men and simultaneously demand men to provide them financially. Wouldn’t you call this bias against men?  

2) Media coverage: Women expect the public to react immediately on news about a woman in distress. Women organizations are putting enough political pressure on the media to cover only those issues where women are victims. At the same time, feminists in media are influencing the way people interpret news story with the help of words that would implicitly suggests that men are criminals and women are victims. The objective is to take away all credibility from the whole male-gender so that a woman is powerful enough to accuse anybody with anything. News of suicide committed by a woman hits the headlines whereas news of suicide committed by a man doesn’t even reach the news. Their aim is not only to sensitize people toward women but also to desensitize people toward men.  Wouldn’t you call this bias against men? 

3) Protective Laws: Laws are enacted to protect the citizen of the country. But in case of women, it is justified to misuse the laws to take revenge. Dowry harassment law has been so composed that women need not only file a dowry harassment case on their husband and in-laws when they harass her for dowry, she can also file a dowry harassment case on their husband and in-laws even when they don’t follow the rules made by her. Her rules could be 1) paying money to her parents 2) transferring the property, house to her name 3) kicking in-laws out of the house 4) making her husband submissive. All these are reasons that a woman can file dowry harassment case on her husband and in-laws. The police, in order to exploit the vulnerable position of the husband, will make every effort to settle the case with a huge monetary compensation paid to the woman. Husband who never demanded any dowry and never harassed his wife had to pay his wife huge sum of money only because he is a man. Wouldn’t you call this bias against men?  

4) Children: It is a proven fact that the computation of sex ratio is not accurate because it is based on predetermined assumptions, which are subjected to errors. Knowing this fact, women organizations are doing everything to influence the people with these questionable sex ratios in order to demand more rights for women. Knowing the ulterior motives of these unscrupulous women organizations, it will not be a surprise to see if females are born more than males, women organizations will continue to fabricate the reports to extract more legal rights for women. Who knows, maybe more females are born than males and they are concealed from the public. More women-centric serials are produced with these women issues as their theme to brainwash the people to think that women are victims, stronger and superior, and men are criminals, abusers and inferiors. Wouldn’t you call this bias against men?  

5) Education: Reports say that there are more males working as child labour than females. There are more males who drop out of the school forced by the family to start earning working as a labour. Despite these facts, the Government is forced to provide free education only for females on the instruction of women organizations who are exploiting the government’s stand on vote-bank politics. Women organizations want men to work as labour and women to work as top executives. They want men to remain illiterates so that they remain submissive to educated women. It is extremely disturbing that those little boys having great ambitions are forced to work as labour because of these devilish women organizations. Wouldn’t you call this bias against men?  

As long as these unscrupulous women organizations remain in the country,
India cannot progress. They are forgetting that women learn more from men than from women and if they want to ruin men’s life, they are actually ruining their own life. If you want respect, give respect. If women are insulting male-gender, their own gender will lose all respect. Excessive pampering of women-centric issues has infact made people more insensitive toward women and women only are to be blamed for their hate-mongering attitude.  

Bias is only against men. It has always been men and now also men are on the receiving end. Not only women organizations but also the people who have been ignoring these negative development created by women are to be blamed for decadent condition of the society. All the claims made by women that there is bias against women are false.    

Women exposed

The book ‘If men have all the power, how come women make the rules?’ written by Jack Kammer has indeed shook the very foundation of feminism, so to speak. It has incorporated some of the most thought-provoking facts about women, which men often overlook it or even ignore considering it to be a natural quality of women. The observation he made in this should have been known to all men but Jack Kammer probably is much more courageous to defend his self-respect against the incessant attacks of feminism.  

Some of the facts given in the book are enumerated below: 

1) Women invent rules, manipulate men to obey them, and in this way dominate men – but in no way apply the rules to themselves.  

2) How come men never say, “It’s a man’s world”? 

3) Our greatest weakness is our façade of strength. Women’s greatest strength is their façade of weakness. 

4) If men have all the power how come women make the rules? 

5) Women’s power is difficult to see and measure. As long as women can pretend they don’t have any power, we can’t call them on how they use and misuse it.  

6) It’s tough to trust a person who holds a club behind her back and says, “A club? What club? I don’t have a club.”  

7) As long as women get away with thinking we’re inferior, they’ll have no qualms about treating us badly. They might not even know they’re doing it. 

Any man would be damaged by the allegation that ‘he doesn’t respect women.’ Why is it so hard to imagine that any woman would be hurt by the charge that ‘she doesn’t respect men”? 

9) Women get a lot of power just out of the fact that they expect and demand special and preferential treatment. 

10) Most of the damage women do is indirect. If she only bats her eyes to induce a guy into a fight, nobody’s going to blame her. Women do a lot of things that provoke and trigger responses in men. But nobody seems able to see that. 

11) Society authorizes women to use make-up, fashion and jewelry to gain attention and stimulate sexual demand among men.  

12) Women laugh at us when studies show that we think about sex several times per hour. We could get a bigger laugh if anyone ever did a study on how often women think about being sexy. 

13) If a woman ends a marriage, she is putting an end to a stifling and oppressive relationship. If a man ends a marriage, he is abandoning his family. If a woman decides not to marry someone, it is her choice of making her life as happy as she can. If a man decides not to marry someone, he is a womanizer or afraid of commitment.  

14) The standard for boy behaviour toward girls: You may never every hit a girl, no matter what, not even in self-defence and if you ever do we’ll thrash you to within an inch of your life to teach you a lesson about violence. The standard for girl toward boys: Did you really slug him ? Wow, you go girl. 

15) Why is sex thought to be something women give and we get? 

16) It is statistically true that married men are more successful than unmarried men. But are they more successful because they’re married or are they married because they are successful? 

17) Would we expect a mother without custody to continue to cook and clean for her ex-husband? Then why do we expect the non-custodial father to keep providing money, especially to an ex-wife who interferes with his visitation time? 

18) A false allegation of rape can have consequences as severe as or even worse than an actual rape.  

19) Women coined the emotionally powerful phrase, “date rape” to identify a danger they face. We need to popularize “fake rape” to call attention to a problem that threatens us. 

20) When a man and woman commit a crime together, prosecutor invariably assume that the man is the truly guilty party while the woman was only a hapless – maybe she was abused – duped in the male’s nefarious plot. They’ll make a deal with her and she’ll cry on the witness stand and explain to the jury how bad, bad man was bad, bad, bad. So, in large measure, we live in a society in which women can reckon they have a fair shot at getting off scot-free for even heinous crimes – if they can raise a convincing tear or two and have a defenseless (dead will do) nearby man to finger.  

21) If our lives are so wonderful and women’s are so full of oppression and degradation, why do we commit suicide 4-5 times more often than girls and women do? 

22) Did you ever notice that when we have opinions that women don’t like, they’re not called opinions, but ‘attitudes’? 

Obviously women won’t like to read these points which itself proves that all these points are true. They may even try to hide their faces while this book exposes them to the whole world. Some men too would find it absurd because their individuality is totally dependent on what women think about them. A person with keen observation will find these points as true, intriguing and also unfortunate because nobody else seem to realize this deception that women have been playing with men and also the society for decades. Let’s hope that people realizes the above truth and seek to live in an egalitarian society instead of deceptive women’s society where they are expected to hate men. 

Feminists under fire

For decades feminists have flourished spectacularly and have invaded print media and television to voice their lists of rights that seemed alright for men. Not any more. Only recently, men are beginning to realize the inappropriate radicalism in feministic ideology, which they initially believed will attain gender equality, and are now willing to object on their one-sided feminists’ movement.  

By holding on to the sham belief that it’s a Man’s world, these feminists have managed to carve a niche for themselves where they continue to be called the weaker gender but still make all the rules not only for themselves but also for men. It is an important question to ask, “If men have all the powers, how come women make all the rules?” Men’s greatest weakness is that they can’t justify their weakness. Women’s greatest strength is that they can portray themselves as weak.  

When men began realizing the deception behind feminism and all those issues concerning gender equality and women empowerment, they began their aggressive movement onto the internet because media weren’t willing to challenge women organizations. At first, they were brutally rebuked by the people but now people are beginning to realize that what has been written on the internet about deceptive feminism is actually true. Even the media has come under pressure from e-defense of men against feministic attacks. Men have finally decided to throw away all traditional inhibitions and have started to object vigorously against women. This was something these feminists had never imagined.  

The number of men’s organization working on the internet to spread awareness about the deceptive feminism, gender equality and women empowerment has been steadily increasing and soon the media will be forced to expose this deception to the whole nation. This deception has only increased the hatred in women towards men. Now men are realizing that gender equality policy is a zero sum game. Men need to lose for women to win. This is no longer acceptable for men, which has become a major concern for the women organizations all over the World. Men are also finding it highly offensive when these feminists are producing male-bashing advertisements to encourage women to ridicule men.  

The deceptive feministic ideology, which gave women legal control over men, is no longer effective enough for women to rule the world and are now beginning to feel apprehensive about their fate that was built on falsehood. It seems that now women are realizing that what they wanted to achieve will not only put men at the receiving end but will also put their own respect in the society in jeopardy. People are becoming insensitive toward women seeing the way women are progressing and demanding ludicrous rights making men vulnerable and defenseless. They want all the rights but are shamelessly shunning all responsibility and accountability.  

It is unfortunate that people had accepted the feminist ideology that men should lose for women to win. However, there are some people in media who are stubbornly portraying women as oppressed by men and it would not be a surprise if these people are women. Just a few women in power are propagating their hate-mongering attitude onto all the women of the country with the help of media, either by showing male-bashing advertisements, publishing one-sided dowry cases and/or showing women as victims and men as criminals. It is a shame that there is none to object against these anti-social activities of these feminists. People’s increasing insensitiveness toward women was inevitable, thanks to these hate-mongering feminists. 

If women wants to be respected, then they must respect men. They can’t go on hating men and exploit the Indian tradition and victimize men legally. If women will harass men, men will fight back.  

Male-bashing advertisements

The only way women’s status can be improved is by representing men as criminals, stupid, irresponsible and abusers. This is what the new-age advertising code of conduct is all about.  With the increasing feminists working in advertising agencies, their male-hating attitude clearly oozes from their advertisements. It is no longer about women becoming stronger and achieving their potentials. It is now about how to make all men submissive to a woman’s domination.  

It is now not uncommon to see a woman slapping a man in advertisements. If it is wrong for man to hit a woman, why are these feminists trying to justify a woman hitting a man? Sociologists say that these are an encouragement to women to get physical with men, which will definitely hurts a man’s sensibilities and will also damage woman’s status in the society. Some male-hating women working in advertising agencies are coming up with creative ideas to ridicule men’s masculinity making men ashamed of their own self. This can be said to be am ingenious idea to empower women to control men but in the long run, women will prove to be a loser.  

It is a shame that Advertising agencies have lost all ethical code of conduct and have begun producing such anti-social male-bashing advertisements. Gender equality is not about making men inferiors with the help of such advertisements and woman-centric serials that portray men as criminals, abusers, oppressors, stupid or senseless. This is happening in foreign countries too and men’s organizations have begun protesting against this attack. But in
India, there are no men’s organizations to fight against this injustice and inappropriate representation of male-gender.  

By showing men as inferiors to women will only increase the gender gap and that can be clearly seen in the increasing number of divorce cases. Who is responsible for this sad condition of our society? These hate-mongering feminists have gone too far and needs to be disciplined by enforcing strict guidelines on advertisements. Any derogatory advertisement toward male-gender must invite legal action against the culprit.   

Stop male-bashing advertisements. Enough is enough. By resorting to such male-bashing advertisements to empower women is a sign of cowardice and shamelessness.

Husbands are often assaulted by their wife

Women are always the victims of domestic violence and men are the main culprits. In order to protect women, domestic violence bill has been passed, on the proposal of women’s group.  

Let us see how the above perception of the general public gets shattered when we come across cases such as this given in here.  

It is disturbing to know that only when a woman’s complaint is proved false, that is precisely when we get to know that, as a matter of fact, the husband was subjected to domestic violence, let alone those husbands who are not yet falsely accused under the criminal case of 498A by his wife but still they continue to suffer the domestic violence.  

A woman can never hurt a man because a man is physically stronger than women. But, what if a man is under a tremendous emotional pressure where he is unable to defend himself from the assault of his wife? Then wouldn’t it be logical to believe that women are physically stronger than men when it comes to marriage because men usually tolerate their wife’s regular tantrums? Thanks to the society for considering wife’s cruel tantrums as part and parcel of a marriage life for men.  

Out of many thousand cases, there is a need to mention one case where a wife subjected her husband to physical torture and still went to the police station to lodge a complaint against her husband of domestic violence. Weird isn’t it? 

http://www.telegraphindia.com/1060609/asp/bengal/story_6329925.aspThis is precisely what happened in Jalpaiguri, where a couple, Ishani and Sumana got married. Sumana, 30-year-old woman, started assaulting her husband so cruelly that he used to bleed at night. Now when a man begins to bleeding, it surely is convincing evidence that his wife would have assaulted him very cruelly.   

The battered husband, Ishani, then learnt that his wife was a psychiatric patient who was under medication. The innocent husband was denied vital facts about Sumana before marriage. Concealing vital facts about a woman from the prospective groom before marriage isn’t something new. It happens most of the time and when the husband comes to know about the truth, it is already too late.  

Sumana expressed her desire to meet her parents and left to Asansol – a place. Sumana lodged a police complaint as soon as she reached there. She made her complaint under IPC section 498A, already notorious for being largely misused by women in
India.  

Ishani was immediately arrested and was sent him to jail. The person who was subjected to cruelty is arrested and sent to jail. This is how our judicial system works. Instead of arresting Sumana, they arrested Ishani and was sent to jail. 

He then moved the high court, which granted him bail after knowing that he who had been physically abused and not the other way round. What if he couldn’t prove his innocence? He would have been sent to jail for 7 years rigorous imprisonment just like those men who couldn’t disprove the false allegation of their wife under IPC 498A.  

It would be a mistake to consider the above case as an exception because 498A is massively misused in our society and in most of the cases women are the ones who cruelly treat their husbands. Ishani’s life is ruined now. Who is responsible? Sumana, his wife, Sumana’s parents who concealed vital facts about her, or our judicial system, who has given a legal protection to women which is excessively biased.  

But the good news is that more and more men’s organizations are opening up in the country because they are realizing that women are not the only ones who are victims, men too are victimized and unfortunately, the legal system is favoring only women.  

Don’t be surprised when you see many more men’s organization been established to protect the basic rights of men. But, beware that women are potentially capable to victimize men emotionally, physically, and legally. Next time you see a woman filing a case against her husband, chances are that she has filed a false case.

Obedient women

Women are very obedient. Whatever a man says, women will do it. They are totally dependent on men. They can’t take their own decisions. They would blindly follow whatever men tell them to do.  

We know this isn’t true at all.   

But, the media and the judiciary follow this assumption to crack a case.  

If a woman commits suicide, by default, the husband is arrested. There is no second thought. Constable says, “Sir, we have a case of housewife committing suicide. What do we do?” Inspector replies, “Arrest the husband.” There is no investigation whatsoever. They assume that husband must have said, “Darling, why don’t you commit suicide?” And the wife obediently commits suicide without saying a word. They assume that women are so obedient that they would never use their own mind. They are completely dependent on their husband and whatever her husband will say, they would do it.  

Crime committed by women is also handled in the same way. A housewife gets caught in a sex racket. The first action the cops take is to arrest her husband. Constable says, “Sir, the woman we arrested in prostitution is a housewife.” Inspector replies, “Immediately arrest her husband.” They assume that husband must have said, “Darling, why don’t you sell your body?” The wife would reply, “Okay, you are my husband so I will do whatever you tell me to do.” This is the assumption behind their investigation. 

Such investigative protocol of the police has never been objected by anybody. Why? Does this sort of investigative protocol apply to a case where a man commits suicide? NoWhen a man commits suicide, the constable says, “Sir, a man has committed suicide.” The inspector replies “Get the body to the post-mortem and help his wife with insurance procedures.” Why such a discriminatory treatment? A woman commits suicide and the husband is arrested; when a man commits suicide and he is considered mentally unstable.  

Perhaps the discriminatory treatment given to men is the reason why men commit suicide more than women. Surprised!!!! Men commit suicide more than women. Its official and the way men are treated these days, the number of suicide committed by men will only increase.    

Some argue that men are arrested because they drive a woman to commit suicide. Then this also means that all those men who committed suicide were forced by their wife. No, this does not apply in men’s case, women groups argue. They only want men to be arrested and not women.  

Well, in that case there are so many thousands of men who haven’t committed suicide even after their wife drives them toward it. If there is murder and also attempt to murder; there should also be abetment to suicide and attempt to abet suicide. Thousands of women are driving their husband to commit suicide and the poor husband knows he can’t give up the responsibilities toward his children and so he silently endures his wife’s torture.  

And if not charging a woman with attempt to abet suicide, at least these harassed men should be given some legal protection that they can report to the police and seek relief from his wife’s torture. No, men should not be provided any legal protection, women groups argue.  

Besides, the way our society is living, who will believe a man if he reports that he is harassed by his wife? The society says, “Come on, you don’t have to complain on such petty issues, these are all part and parcel of a married life and such issues should not be taken so seriously.” But when a woman complains, the society says, “The man should be punished. No man is supposed to harass his wife like this. Women should not keep quiet on such harassment.” 

A man’s complaint is frivolous and a woman’s complaint is genuine harassment. Now that’s discriminatory.  

Whatever a woman does, blame comes on a man only.